Tuesday, December 2, 2014

The unintended consequences in the use of social metrics



I have been working on understanding how to measure social activity for several years.  I think it is extremely valuable to get objective data on how we are using our social tools to get insights into the value of 'social' and also the challenges.  We can now gather a huge amount of data and the analytics capability is really exciting.  But I am also concerned with how we use these measurements.  Many companies turn the metrics into a tool to drive behavior rather than an indicator on how we are doing.  This can result in driving dysfunctional behavior since people are focused on increasing a number rather than contributing because they have something worthwhile to share.  

"When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure."  Goodhart's Law (1975).  Professor Emeritus of Economics at London School of Economics.  (source: Wikipedia)

"The more any quantitative social indicator (or even some qualitative indicator) is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor."  Campbell's Law (1976).  a social psychologist  and the author of many works on research methodology.  (italics added) (source: Wikipedia)